reasons he had promised me, adding that I had expected him to send me the same, he excused himself by saying that he had done a lot of unforeseen
I did not receive the letter because it was not yet signed by Pastor Kavel himself or by an elder. At Fiedler's house I met Mr. Fiedler, who had just returned, and I was able to talk to him quite a bit alone. I told him that I had given Bertha a ring, to which he had no objection. I spent a few hours with Bertha in the first room that evening; while Julius Fiedler,
[from page 173 there is no longer a page number manually written; the numbering continues in the sequence of the present pages]
November 8th, 1839.
But when I got up, Mr. Fiedler came to me with the above-mentioned letter in his pocket. To my astonishment, it was not yet signed and in the envelope there was an announcement that yesterday evening Pastor Kavel and the elder revealed that they could not change the decision to report the whole thing with Schlinke and my bride to my Company. At the same time, Mr. Fiedler had a letter to Schlinke, which in any case had the same content as mine. While I was reading the letters, Br. Teichelmann joined us and a long conversation followed between the three of us about Pastor Kavel's procedures in this and some previous cases. Mr. Fiedler was very angry with Pastor Kavel and said that he would write to him. After we had lunch with Br. Teichelmann, I went into town with Mr. Fiedler and then went to Anga's section, where we chatted confidentially about all kinds of things, especially about my future mother-in-law. Late in the evening I wrote a rude letter to Pastor Kavel.